Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital dementia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. L Faraone  03:36, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Digital dementia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not encyclopaedic. Reads like a "how-to" guide and appears to contain original research. Deb (talk) 12:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a commonly-used term, sources don't indicate notability. There's some related articles we might redirect to, like Is Google Making Us Stupid? which are more in-depth and better sourced. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:30, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioral science-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  18:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  18:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Notability not established. Mcewan (talk) 11:29, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This may be a borderline WP:NEOLOGISM case but ultimately I find the sources underwhelming to show that this is both a widely used term as well as a notable one. Mkdw talk 01:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.