Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital estate memorial


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Online memorial. Nobody seems to be very convinced that this should stay an article, but not a very clear consensus for straight deletion either.  Sandstein  08:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Digital estate memorial

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not sure what to do about this article. "Digital estate memorial" seems to be a neologism; I can't find anything on Google (24 unique results) that's not a blog or a copy of the Wikipedia article.

The sources provided don't talk about "digital estate memorial" as a general concept, but some talk about digital memorialization. Maybe the answer is to rename it to "digital memorialization", or to move any useful information into other articles like digital inheritance. In any case, the phrase "digital estate memorial" implies a legal concept, which the article does not address except in passing. ... disco spinster   talk  03:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  04:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete and then draft and userfy if needed as this article is still questionably solid. SwisterTwister   talk  05:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Rename or merge - rename if a better, more commonly used term for this exists. If there are many references on the issue of this article all using different names the most descriptive one should be chosen via another poll on the talk page. Otherwise merge into online memorial, memorial or digital inheritance. --Fixuture (talk) 23:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.