Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital exhaust


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Transwiki then delete. Definitions have been transwiki'd j⚛e deckertalk 16:43, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Digital exhaust

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

More of a definition, tagged for notability for over 4 years.  Puffin  Let's talk! 21:38, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:NOTDIC TheMesquito (talk) 04:21, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:13, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:13, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Transwiki to Wiktionary. Neither "digital exhaust" nor "exhaust data" seem to be there, but with the sources here plus a couple of post-2007 additions (e.g. Forbes in 2011 and New Scientist in 2012) it would appear to meet Wiktionary's inclusion criteria. Cnilep (talk) 01:29, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 09:27, 21 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Transwiki per Cnilep - it belongs there. Lukeno94 (talk) 14:27, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: The definition is now at digital exhaust. Cnilep (talk) 07:29, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.