Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital losers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P | Talk 16:33, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Digital losers
Tagged as a speedy, but IMO does not qualify. non-notable web forum. 7 google hits on the URL, including wikipedia; Alexa says no data; site itself says it is in "beta". Delete. DES (talk) 19:19, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed, please delete - this was a mistake done by a rogue member and I was not aware of it. Again, I apologize on behalf of the website team - Zer0render, Talk 00:19, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom &mdash; Lomn | Talk / RfC 19:40, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete RC1, maybe these should be speedies. feydey 22:09, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete naturally. --Fsdfs 07:11, 13 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.