Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital property framework


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 12:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Digital property framework

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism serving as a coatrack to promote a company. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 01:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Feel free to delete if you like, this is a valid framework with years of research behind it, not designed to promote a company, but rather emerged from a company on the leading edge of the issue, and is provided to promote open standards in dealing with canvas based environments as opposed to intellectual property. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marlinknecht (talk • contribs) 01:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete coatrack, explained using more marketing words that I can handle, and I run a market dept. for a living. P HARMBOY  ( TALK ) 02:14, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as written. It may be possible for someone experienced in that field AND Wikipedia to actually make it encyclopedic. With respects to Marlinknecht, perhaps you might consider doing sourcing and rewriting? I myself do not have the knowledge as to what is or is not important in that article... but it feels like it has possibilities.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The content is promotional and unencyclopedic. In addition, the page is a copyright violation of http://digitalpropertyregistry.org/ --Megaboz (talk) 02:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, pure promotional material. Owen&times; &#9742;  14:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. They are also advertising at rational data industry model. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.