Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital sign


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect. Johnleemk | Talk 14:49, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Digital sign
Copy of Digital signage, which was recently vandalised by adverts. Borrows information from both Digital signage and Narrowcasting, and contains spam to external websites. Delete as WP is not an ad service. Article also contains a 10-page list of useless definitions (such as "byte", "button", and "Del" [Yes, the delete key on your keyboard]). Kareeser|Talk! 18:37, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

I am doing this free and altruistically and while I am doing it there is one that is dedicated to criticize before hoping to see the results. If I have chosen to make this page it is by the facts that occur with Digital Signage where it seems that the only thing that it matters are the external links and advertinsing and the order of such and not the information that is offered to the users.

Kormak.
 * Comment &mdash; What "results"? So far, you've stopped editing, and what you have done is promote links to external websites only to generate revenue and traffic, and place a lot of unnecessary information on the page. Your "definitions" are all copied from scala.com! Kareeser|Talk! 16:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Redirect to digital signage. Edgar181 21:03, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Before criticizing and accusing is better to inquire a little.

TheMost of the content of that glossary is based on "The Digital Signage Glossary of Terms is an open source project with the cooperation of the Digital Display industry. D3 magazine would like pay special thanks to the digital signage software provider SCALA for their help in compiling the terms and definitions presented.  If you would like to help us expand on these terms and definitions, feel free to email us with your ammendments, new terms, or suggestions   lief@d3magazine.com "

I thought that Wikipedia was an suitable place to offer that knowledge to the users, but if it isn´t then that somebody erase it.

Kareeser, finally I say that I do this in my free time, and I do that from an altruistic form. There is no one external link in that page, only knowledge.

Everybody can see the log of the modifications done to the page and see that while somebody was working ther other was criticizing before hoping to see the results.

Let's Wikipedia decide.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.