Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digitalsoft Keypoint


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 00:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Digitalsoft Keypoint

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Violates WP:ADVERT, WP:SOAP, WP:SPS. Lacks notability. Primary website link not working. Veryhuman (talk) 23:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak delete: There are several mentions on non-reliable sites (messageboards, sites offering software downloads, info on file formats, etc) but nothing that can be the basis of a WP page. Software for this intended market of clergypersons is unlikely to get mainstream media coverage.  There may be references in reputable specialist publications (Electro-Bishop Quarterly?) but I can't find them.  If the software/website is now defunct/unsupported, that suggests we shouldn't wait for future references. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: virtually no coverage in the wild (even in blogs). — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 20:46, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. All sources in the article violate WP:PRIMARY and we "[cannot] base articles and material entirely on primary sources." There are no Google News results, which leads me to believe that we will not be able to locate WP:RS. There is no choice here but to delete until the product has received WP:SIGCOV or meets some other WP:N guideline. -- Sailing to Byzantium  ( msg ),  03:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.