Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilara Fındıkoğlu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus seems to be that this article needs rewriting, not deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Dilara Fındıkoğlu

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Also, possibly undisclosed paid contribution for PR purposes and advertising. Kadı   Message   08:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion, Turkey,  and England.  Kadı    Message   08:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Nope ser, not true at all. First of all, this is not a paid contribution, not even close to "possibly" as she's well-covered on most fashion leading publications in the UK/World including i-D, Dazed, Vogue with not only written content but also visual documentaries. I'd recommend doing research about the topic like I did to be able to write this article. So you can check my statements one by one and can see it's all covered by the sources following my own research. Second, the reason why I created this article is because I think she's an important designer as she changed the standards for one of the most famous fashion schools, the collaborations she made with world's well-known fashion people FKA Twigs, Madonna, Bella Hadid, etc. How many Turkish fashion designers are able to reach that level in these days? And finally she caught my attention after I saw the news about she's the designer working for Mayor of Istanbul, Ekrem İmamoğlu. Have great week everyone and my Turkish friend Kadı :) Palaangelino (talk) 11:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Palaangelino (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.
 * It is very meaningful to see you active again for this nomination after 8 months. Kadı    Message   17:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Surprise! :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MaxnaCarter (talk) 11:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Several hits in Vogue UK, leaning keep, but the potential paid contribution is concerning. We could rewrite it, I think there is enough for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 14:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Of course notable. It's just ssssneaky nomination by Kadı. Be cautious about this guy tho. Anyway, have a great Wiki everyone! Palaangelino (talk) 04:29, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep There is some concerns of paid COI, but several hits by Vogue UK is enough for me. Still, however, that there is some puffery, which requires rewriting the article.  Mario Jump  83!  01:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:36, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Agreed, the article is rather "puffy" and needs a rewrite. Oaktree b (talk) 13:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep, I will re-echo the COI concerns, however with coverage by Vogue and many other RS coverage she passes the GNG. Promotional content should be tackled via editing. Pika voom  Talk 06:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment See Conflict of interest/Noticeboard for the COI concerns. Some input there could be useful. ~Styyx Talk ? 17:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.