Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dillanos Coffee Roasters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. — Cactus Writer (talk) 20:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Dillanos Coffee Roasters

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP with no independent coverage. Sources are promotional interviews, press releases, and a non-notable award. 💥Casualty • Hop along. •  20:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies,  and Washington.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  21:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete 3 sources are X, 2 are interviews. Not enough coverage.Yolandagonzales (talk) 20:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Outside the references present in the article, via my cursory searches, the subject doesn't appear to have adequate independent sig coverage. X (talk) 08:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per Nom and user "X". There are around 33.3 million "small" businesses in the United States. Wikipedia does not need to have an article on them all (or any) because the company (owners are or other "connected" individuals) desires one. "Interviews" (agree with "promotional" per Nom), press releases, interviews (per ) and other primary sources do not advance notability. I could not find multiple independent, significant coverage, per policies and guidelines on sourcing to agree with a stand alone article. -- Otr500 (talk) 17:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.