Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilwala(2023 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 17:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Dilwala(2023 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Dilwala(2023 film)

A naïve Google search shows that this appears to be an unreleased film. IMDB, which is an unreliable source, says that it is upcoming. IMDB also has an incomprehensible summary, which was copied into this article, but which I have removed as copyvio. (The IMDB contributor apparently is not fluent with English.) This article was in mainspace, but was moved into draft space, citing paid editing and sockpuppetry. It was then declined, with the instruction to add reviews when the film was released. It has now been moved back into article space without the reviews (because it hasn't been released). Either the cast listing can be moved into draft space until the film is released and reviewed, or it can be blown up, and started over when the film is released and reviewed. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete See Dilwala (2023 film); trying to evade the constant speedies there by taking it to a slightly different-named article title. Enough, get some sources with an actual byline from an actual person who typed said source, and I'm completely against draftifying this.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 22:59, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - User:MrSchimpf - Another attempt at the gaming of names, omitting the space to look different. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:19, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and salt. I don't see why an AfD is even needed.  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 05:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a violation of WP:G4. Partofthemachine (talk) 00:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC) Delete as an attempt to game the system, but this technically does not qualify for G4 speedy deletion because it has not been subject to a previous deletion discussion, as pointed out below. Partofthemachine (talk) 20:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Question - I don't see a previous AFD under any spelling. Am I missing something?  I see repeated submissions, but I don't see an AFD, and I think that this AFD is required.  Robert McClenon (talk) 06:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment There were no previous AfD noms; it's been speedied each time its come up for either sockpuppetry or pay-for-play, so I do think this nom should go the full seven to solidify that consensus.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 18:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.