Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimelo! Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 09:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Dimelo! Records

 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Vanispamcruftisement. Contested prods. MER-C 03:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. They don't even try to assert notability. --RaiderAspect 12:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no references, only 1st party sources, and no assertations of notability beyond its devotion to salsa. This looks like failing WP:CORP to me. Callix 12:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep, because companies are signigficant and it's useful to learn more about them for consumers. --Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? 16:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * just opined "strong keep" in 27 AFD discussions over a period of 35 minutes, several times with clearly disruptive rationales. Uncle G 16:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, non notable, no references. Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 17:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Cremepuff222. Acalamari 18:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Ok so how do I fix the entry so you all will accept it? per Dimelo! Records. User:Dimelorecords 10:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Review WP:CORP. --RaiderAspect 11:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.