Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimensionless momentum-depth relationship in open-channel flow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Open-channel flow. Liz Read! Talk! 06:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Dimensionless momentum-depth relationship in open-channel flow

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Original research Lokys dar Vienas (talk) 19:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:32, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to pass WP:SIGCOV. There are offline sources at the bottom of the article. The page has existed in mainspace for the last 9 years, and it does need inline citations. Without engaging with the sources, I am not seeing a strong argument here that the article is in fact original research or non-notable. We need an in-depth analysis of the sources to prove the claim of original research.4meter4 (talk) 19:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * There is no evidence that the bunch of publications at the bottom support the text and I dont think anybody is in a posittion to analyze this text. Lokys dar Vienas (talk) 19:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete I have engineering training to understand this, but I don't understand what makes it an encyclopedia article. "This topic contribution was made in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Virginia Tech, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering course: CEE 5984 – Open Channel Flow during the Fall 2010 semester." tells me everything I need to know that this isn't appropriate for this project, with extensive use of "we" and the class example "The example above comes from Dr. Moglen’s “Open Channel Flow” course (CEE5384) in Virginia Tech, U.S". Yes, textbooks such as those cited describe how to solve this sort of problem in engineering, but that doesn't mean this particular type of problem is a notable topic here. Reywas92Talk 21:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:36, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect, to Open-channel flow. The current article fails WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. SailingInABathTub 🛁 09:43, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect, to Open-channel flow. This is not the place to provide detailed textbook solutions. StarryGrandma (talk) 00:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.