Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimitrios


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. X clamation point  03:09, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Dimitrios

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Prod reason was "Fails WP:NOTE. No claims to notability for this painter. Dimitrios plus Powerdot gives thirty distinct Google hits, no Google News hits, one article from the St Maarten Daily Herald, a small newspaper where the artists works as webmaster (so not really an independent source..." The since added sources are nationmaster (a Wikipedia mirror), the above mentioned Daily Herald article, PRweb (press releases, not an indpendent reliable source), and caribbean corners, a commercial site for Caribbean artists. The only somewhat independent and reliable one is an article in an inflight maazine for an airline by an unknown writer. I don't believe that this single article is sufficient to meet WP:NOTE. None of the listed expositions seem to be of any importance and have (if Google is reliable in this regard) not received any attention at all. The google count has changed to 33 distinct hits and still no Google News hits. Fram (talk) 14:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 15:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't seem to be encyclopedic material...Modernist (talk) 22:04, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete on notability. Johnbod (talk) 20:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.