Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DinCloud, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  10:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

DinCloud, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  17:34, 16 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Insignificant company with very little coverage. Fairly close to being just advertising. Fails WP:CORP QU TalkQu 21:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. The company has received some converge (see this Google news query), but I find all coverage to be either trivial or incidental and thus WP:CORPDEPTH is not met. Let the company receive coverage in verifiable, mainstream sources and then I'm sure an enthusiastic Wikipedian will write up an article. -- Sailing to Byzantium  ( msg ),  22:25, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.