Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinesh Kunwar Patel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Shalu Robot. (non-admin closure) — Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 14:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Dinesh Kunwar Patel

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:BLP1E. Only known for creating the Shalu Robot, and sources only cover him within that context. Was and likely to remain a low profile individual, as an engineer and academic. Some details from this page can be merged into Shalu Robot. Yee no  (talk) 🍁 01:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Yee no   (talk) 🍁 01:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions.  Yee no   (talk) 🍁 01:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Yee no   (talk) 🍁 01:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Respected Yeeno ji, Thank you for your review the article Dinesh Kunwar Patel cited above.
 * Dear sir, in my opinion it was a really wonderful and big achievement (can't not be categorized as low-profile) that a person created AI humanoid robot with recycled material in such a extremely low cost, which can be compared with many sophisticated robots, capability-wise. The developer become the best motivator as an educationist & as an Engineer for all the young scientist of the world towards AI research in very low budget.
 * As per Wikipedia's High Profile definition, he has given one or more scheduled interviews to a notable publication, website, or television or radio program (please see in his public appearance section of his article).
 * He interviewed by TV Channels, Websites and Radios. Therefore, I think he should be considered as an individual in his name for his wonderful work to motivate others.
 * Best Regards
 * --LuckyThor (talk) 09:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Hey Yeeno,
 * I think this article should stay considering the widespread coverage the man has received in Asian (primarily Indian) media. Humanoid robots are rare in India, which is currently lacking behind in their development from several :nations. In my knowledge, the man has received high appreciation from local government officials and high academician of the country. It would be nice to have a article on him.
 * --2409:4040:E8C:8DF:196A:B6B1:5E3:EFBD (talk) 10:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC) — 2409:4040:E8C:8DF:196A:B6B1:5E3:EFBD (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * WP:LOUTSOCK, see Special:Diff/1033543812. Blablubbs (talk) 10:08, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * The article shouldn't be deleted as the person is now quite popular and his background may positively influence many people. He can be an inspiration for those who have lack of resources and still they have potential to do the wonders. — Dinotrainer (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 19:46, 13 July 2021 (UTC).
 * Delete - though he has public apperance in media, it is not enough to pass WP:NPROF. His contribution is already mentioned in Shalu Robot. nirmal (talk) 09:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  10:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC) I'm going for a weak keep on the grounds that people have a legitimate interest in the sort of personality that creates a robot with personality. This makes such personalities more notable than an average engineer. It is very difficult to untangle the extent to which newspaper articles about the robot and its(her!) inventor are about the robot, or about the inventor, so the wiki-lawyer can swing it either way. My weak-keep is based on the idea that the article about the person can reasonably contain information such as his family life (of legitimate human interest: that he has created a robot-'daughter' but has no flesh-and-blood daughter) which sits uneasily in an article centred correctly on the robot. Give them both articles, and you can write about robots in the robot one, about humans in the human one. Elemimele (talk) 18:14, 18 July 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Looking for further contributions from uninvolved editors, referencing BLP/GNG and this article's suitability or otherwise.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Shalu Robot. Everything relevant about the subject is or can be covered in the context of the robot. The subject should be notable in their own right, not just "more notable than an average engineer." The public appeareances section is WP:INDISCRIMINATE and details about personal life does not warrant a seperate article. -- Ab207 (talk) 21:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Shalu Robot per above. Hypogaearoots (talk) 07:26, 2 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.