Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinesh Manocha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. m.o.p 06:04, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Dinesh Manocha

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable. Only references are internal press release + one dead link. Undoubtedly a good scientist but not a notably good scientist  Velella  Velella Talk 23:08, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —Nsk92 (talk) 02:54, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Easily passes WP:PROF on several counts: Distinguished Professor/Named Chair at a major university (WP:PROF#C5), elected ACM Fellow and AAAS Fellow (WP:PROF#C3), h-index above 40 (according to this, it's actually 55), lots of biographical coverage if one only cares to do a little googling (e.g. here, etc). Nsk92 (talk) 03:28, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:PROF #C1, C3, and C5. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:11, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Clear keep. Stupendous cites on GS and all of the above. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:50, 15 July 2011 (UTC).
 * Comment. A course of action often followed by editors who have made an egregiously inappropriate AfD nomination is to withdraw the nomination gracefully and move on to other things. This reduces the workload of other editors. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.