Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinkoverte


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —S MALL JIM   00:28, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Dinkoverte

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Company of questionable notability, possible hoax. Only provided refs are pictures of articles, which may or may not be real. Google search on the name shows only two results, both on Wikipedia. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:25, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 20 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - not many articles start off with actual references to what appear to be real magazines. I'd wait and see, but then I am a dirty old-school inclusionist. :P Dev920, who misses Jeffpw. 20:54, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I've seen similar actions before from SPAs. But surely, if these were real magazine articles, there would be other references popping up in Google searches. I find it odd that the same image of a chair (with the same image artifacts) is used in both images. Also, one of the images claims to be from the November issue of Skylife magazine - the only Skylife magazine I could find has no mention of it in their online version, but feel free to look for yourself. As for Promotions & Incentives magazine, it appears to be defunct, with their domain nothing but a placeholder, so that also makes me wonder about the credibility of that image. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:24, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Hmm, good points. I take it back. 78.148.22.247 (talk) 09:32, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: a small technology company .... Founded in 2010. Their first and only product is a hardware/software hybrid designed to alleviate the stress of the modern commuter dealing with too many gadgets.  Yeah, like that's going to work.  (And what the hell is it, really?)  "References" are to images hosted at free image hosting sites, and so self-published sources at minimum, and possible hoaxes or PR stunts. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 00:53, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as a hoax. The claim that this technology product managed to cause controversy yet managed to escape the notice of everybody on the internet is completely incredible.  A technology gadget that doesn't even score a single mention on any blog?  That's simply not credible. -- Whpq (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking significant coverage in multiple independent third party sources. Feel free to ping my talk page if these are added to the page. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:24, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.