Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinner For Schmucks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete; no prejudice against recreation. - Philippe 19:47, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Dinner For Schmucks

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:NFF. No prejudice towards recreation when reliable sources can be provided to show that filming has begun. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 20:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, reliable sources -, .  Corvus cornix  talk  22:32, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, Sources for a film that has not been released have to provide evidence that the production itself is notable per notability guidelines according to WP:NFF. The above sources do not. --Captain-tucker (talk) 17:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   —Captain-tucker (talk) 17:24, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for now. Currently fails the WP:NFF notability guidelines as shooting has not started. I note this Times article says this film would happen in 2005 so there is probably some WP:CRYSTAL involved here as well. Davewild (talk) 18:50, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.