Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DinoHaven


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  03:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

DinoHaven
The article was originally deleted because it was ed; therefore, I have been told WP:CSD will not hold up and that I should WP:AFD it. The subject does not presently seem terribly notable as far as companies go and it will most likely fail criteria based on WP:CORP. Also, is the creator of the article, calling into question whether this is a legimate article or something along the lines of self-promotion/WP:SPAM. -- moe .RON   talk  00:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear action edit remove.png|15px]] Strong delete. It's a dead-end page minus the AFD template, it's blatant spam, it's NN, it's a little bit of WP:VSCA. TrackerTV 01:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:CORP. alpha Chimp  laudare 01:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete for too many reasons to list, all of which have already been mentioned. fuzzy510 07:15, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.