Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinocroc 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Redirect to Supergator. Neutralitytalk 06:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Dinocroc 2

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unreferenced, unclear notability. The sequel was proposed, but the network didn't want it. That's about it. Contested prod. ... disco spinster   talk  00:49, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 28 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong delete per WP:NFILM. I wouldn't even suggest a redirect to Dinocroc (which is in terrible shape, btw) because the article even says that most of the information about it is unknown.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 03:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect as reasonable serach term, but to Supergator as THAT is the film Roger Corman made as a sequel when Sci-Fi Channel turned down Dinocroc 2: "He wanted to make a Dinocroc 2. The Sci-Fi Channel balked at a direct sequel because they claimed sequels didn't perform well for them or some typical Sci-Fi brass nonsense. Corman went ahead and made his Dinocroc sequel under the guise of Supergator." and "Corman decided to push forward with a Dinocroc sequel but under a new moniker - Supergator"  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:32, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Just added and sourced a redirect target there: Supergator. It tells of "Dinoroc 2" being turned down and becoming Supergator instead.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 09:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. Good idea. I can't think of anything else to say that might be helpful right now. Kitfoxxe (talk) 05:12, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. The current article is basically devoid of information. J I P  &#124; Talk 06:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.