Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinotrax


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:03, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Dinotrax

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

NN fails WP:BAND only trivial coverage  C T J F 8 3  chat 05:06, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

How is a review of the bands entire discography trivial? (PS I am also still googling the other reviews the band has recieved) ctk986


 * Delete per nom. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:13, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

What? Ctk986 (talk) 08:46, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BAND. Borderline speedy. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:37, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MUSIC.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  02:56, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to fail WP:MUSIC. Reviews on sites that fail WP:RS are worthless to Wikipedia, and I'm struggling to find any substantial coverage in commercial sources. No charting singles, no releases on otherwise notable labels, borderline speedy for lack of assertion of notability. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 09:14, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BAND. Spatulli (talk) 13:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.