Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinu Ghezzo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn. No !votes other than to keep and over 24 hours since the last !vote. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Dinu Ghezzo

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A rather minor figure who receives no more than passing mention in the various sources that bother to mention him. This self-promotional autobiography, Mr. Ghezzo's sole contribution to Wikipedia, should be deleted. Biruitorul Talk 18:53, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn - I guess enough sources have been shown to confirm notability that we can move to writing a more impartial biography. Thank you, and my apologies. - Biruitorul Talk 16:51, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Numerous recordings of his works are available, as well as sheet music for them. He has been mentioned in academic articles and books.  It should be enough. Looie496 (talk) 23:16, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It would be helpful if we had secondary sources to validate the importance of that and verify it, as opposed to Ghezzo's own claims. - Biruitorul Talk 00:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This page lists a bunch of published reviews. It generally takes a bit of effort to verify notability for people who did most of their work before the Internet became ubiquitous. Looie496 (talk) 01:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Even though he is a minor figure, he appears to have made some contributions in his field and may continue to do so. I say the page is worth keeping.Kpstewart (talk) 03:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The article certainly needs a lot of work done to it, but it looks as through the subject is sufficiently notable to justify having an article. -- Klein zach  11:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep See Google Books ; Google News Archive ; this article from a Romanian newspaper ; this confirmation of his award (Order of the Star of Romania) from the Romanian Government . The article needs a big clean-up and is seemingly an autiobiography, neither of which are reasons for deletion . Voceditenore (talk) 15:24, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.