Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dio Brando


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Phantom Blood. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 00:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Dio Brando

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This does not establish notability independent of Phantom Blood through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 20:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  21:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Phantom Blood or delete. Not notable.  The original redirect was legit. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 21 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 01:26, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Insufficient real-world coverage or sourcing to justify a self-standing Wikipedia article. --DAJF (talk) 02:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Phantom Blood. While not notable as a standalone character, Dio is notorius within the series. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:33, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Phantom Blood. The redirect goes to the character's information which is in a small summary form. Not notable for a stand alone article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:50, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.