Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dionne Rakeem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  A  Train talk 07:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Dionne Rakeem

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable musician. The claim of her song "Sweeter than Wine" charting at 46th in the United Kingdom may be false as The Official Charts Company does not show anything about Rakeem or her song (not even in archives) (source in article shows no entry). Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. No secondary sources can be found. The subject-specific guideline (WP:MUSICBIO) exists as secondary to WP:GNG and "meeting any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept." — Za  wl  15:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:MUSICBIO. Proof is available here.-- Laun  chba  ller  15:10, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG--  XFhumu  Talk 15:40, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Is anyone going to address the MUSICBIO findings?

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947 ( c ) (m)   05:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.