Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dionny baez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. A fairly even debate, but I am swayed by the arguments that this person is barely notable, together with the negative aspects of the biography convince me that in this case deletion is called for, and it is within my discretion to do so. Kevin (talk) 04:32, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Dionny baez

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

PROD was removed by article creator. Asserts notability but doesn't seem to meet WP:NOTE. In fact, most results I can see on Google that aren't from the subject's own website or related projects are about a sexual assault charge. X X X antiuser eh? 23:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:35, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The news coverage in reliable sources prior to the conviction is probably just enough to demonstrate notability, so this is not a matter of one event. The conviction is confirmed by a court document, http://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/CPReport.aspx?matterID=200966869 - Eastmain (talk • contribs)  06:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BARE, Eastmain's arguments. Move to Dionny Baez. Bearian (talk) 07:12, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete So he was convicted of a crime. What is notable about that? The coverage other than the court notes is so minimal that it is not notable. Polargeo (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This person is not notable.--Karljoos (talk) 16:33, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.