Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diosynth

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. -- AllyUnion (talk) 12:32, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Diosynth
The reasons were given on the talk page. From Talk:Diosynth:
 * This appears to be an advert. See also Organon International.


 * Ferdinand Pienaar 00:40, 2004 Dec 16 (UTC)

While this page was blank, an anon made this comment:
 * Deletion was possibly requested because the company merges into Organon (see entry). Nevertheless, the name will exist as a brand, so deletion would not be appropriate.
 * ''Unsigned, page history says: 05:29, 2004 Dec 28 195.169.224.219

This was improperly and not completely posted to VfD. I'm finishing the process. No vote. —Mar·ka·ci: 2005-02-13 16:17 Z


 * Delete Brookie 17:45, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, rewrite and expand. Diosynth gets 15,000 Google hits. Megan1967 00:33, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep it . Wyss 01:36, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Lean toward keep. I'm utterly ignorant about the company, but the fact that it may no longer exist in this form is not a reason for deletion. -- Jmabel | Talk 07:03, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, looks notable. JamesBurns 07:53, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.