Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dipak Sharma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. While some of the arguments in this discussion were not particularly strong, nobody has objected to Thincat's assertion that the relevant notability thresholds are met here. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscmscrutinize, talk 15:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Dipak Sharma

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

100 plus sources and none of them are secondary. There's no way that this person is notable enough for Wikipedia. Expressive101 (talk) 10:01, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Nepal.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:10, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep There seem to be at least three references containing sufficient assessment work by the authors for them to be counted as "secondary" and which contain enough for a brief article. The apparant reference bombing is due to the detailed referencing for the excessive lists of awards, etc. Thincat (talk) 10:55, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable person. Citadeol  (talk) 17:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Sources like Online Khabar, Annapurna post, Himalaya times, Image Khabar is a reliable, secondary as well as independent sources to the subject. Fade258 (talk) 10:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: There are a lot of sources. It can be considered significant.-- Jasulan .T  TT me 14:33, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, subject has been making the news for quite some time, therefore has a credible claim to notability. ihateneo ( talk ) 01:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per above passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.