Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dipanshu Tiwari


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. WP:CSD Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:41, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Dipanshu Tiwari

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced BLP that fails notability standard. Was PRODded as hoax, but PROD tag removed. gNews and gBooks searches turn up no relevant hits. Geoff  Who, me? 15:43, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

.... Now i want to say that if you want to delete this article... Delete it but it is 99% true.. I am searching sources for more editing source for improve this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shalini o Dubey (talk • contribs) 19:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - also could not find any credible sourcing, the only extlink does not return any information on the subject name. Completely fails WP:V as it stands. Dl2000 (talk) 16:23, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems likely to be a hoax. Biographical information has been changed rather wildly over the past days by the same small group of editors, e.g. sometimes this individual was born in 1988, sometimes in 1994; sometimes worth $20 billion, other times $20 million. The external link is a link to two articles about other people who also happen to be named "Dipanshu", and does not appear to be about this individual. So, absent some actual source appearing to substantiate the article, delete as likely hoax. --Delirium (talk) 16:25, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * improved quality -I want to tell my all friends that now it have been edited by editor..There can be problem in net connection of author or editor... Issus has ben fixed bu editor on this article.I am not agree for deletion of this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.176.178.91 (talk) 17:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia are you mad?-I  am agree with previos user having iP 223.176.178.91 that this artical is now in improved quality. If you are deleting articles of very important person like dipanshu tiwari than whai is the mean of Wikipedia?...what users will read ?I am agree that this article had some issues but now these have been fixed This article named dipanshu tiwari is now improved and I am not agree with any user who is agree to delete this article..Thank you  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.255.37.171 (talk) 17:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * An awesome and true article-Do not delete it.I am also not agree with those users & administrators who are agree with deletion of this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.218.122.36 (talk) 18:25, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Hoax. -- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  18:43, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Evidence of the truthfullness-
 * Congratulations. You've conclusively proved that this article is a hoax: The Newspaper Clipping Generator -- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  20:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.