Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dipen Kumar Rajak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is consensus at this time that the subject does not currently satisfy the notability requirements of WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. The SandDoctor Talk 18:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Dipen Kumar Rajak

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I didn't find sufficient evidence to warrant a pass of WP:NPROF. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. An Assistant Professor in a high citation engineering field; GScholar h-index of 10 with the top cite 61. Not enough for passing WP:PROF yet. Nsk92 (talk) 12:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:TOOSOON, citation record not good enough yet for WP:PROF and no other claim of notability evident. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: Missing WP:NPROF. WP:TOOSOON in all likelihood. - Roger editor (talk) 11:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Blocked for spamming, likely WP:UPE. MER-C 15:19, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.