Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dipjyoti Borah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. Given the various past deletions I can't see this closing any other way. I'm going to salt all of the various entries and give the article creator a stern warning about re-creation. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:13, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Dipjyoti Borah

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Twenty-year-old who, we are told, is yet another blogger and the founder of yet another website. No independent sourcing, and a search engine shows little that's neither humdrum nor self-promotion. Hoary (talk) 11:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - In addition to the fact that nothing is found in the web, this articles was already deleted in the past, basing on the non significance. And by the name of the creator it looks like that it's the same person. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:22, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, Shirt58 has deleted it twice, and Peridon has deleted it once. -- Hoary (talk) 12:45, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 11:59, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 11:59, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 11:59, 17 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment. My browser won't display the biographee's waytohow.com. It seems to be somehow related to plus.google.com/+Waytohow/posts, which hardly seems in any way noteworthy. I can view the source of waytohow.com. This has an extraordinary number of META tags with the attribute CONTENT; the value for one of these is "We provide Social network, Money making online, traffic tips,education tips, Programming. WayToHow.com, Android, WhatsApp, Facebook, Blogging Tips" and that for the other is "We provide tutorials and unique are articles relates to Making Money online, SEO, Blogging Tips and much more tricks and tips, Hot stuffs and film update". -- Hoary (talk) 13:19, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I am rather surprised that I don't remember that name... That is one irritating site - it's slow to load, and has one of those annoying 'Subscribe to us' popups that keeps coming back. People make money out of things like that? I suppose that there are adverts that I don't see. I will say that he's put work into it. Anyway, that's nowt to do with notability. I usually reckon that if there is nothing worth investigating in the first 10 pages of ghits, there is unlikely to be anything still to come. I do use minuses to eliminate false hits. Didn't need to here. Four pages +1 hit - and nothing looking like an RS. Seems to be quite a bit of publicity seeking, which is, of course, why he's here. May be notable some day - Huffington Post didn't become notable overnight. In the meantime, I'd advise salt as well as delete. Peridon (talk) 13:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I will add that this version of the article is way better than the one I deleted - but creating a good-looking article is not the same as creating a Good Article. You can't make a suit of clothes out of Vogue magazines. You need cloth, and the right sort of cloth - and that's what isn't there yet. Peridon (talk) 13:51, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * As DIPJYOTI BORAH it was deleted by # - that makes four. And the website article has been deleted too, and a lot of links to the blog removed. I'm thinking along the lines of WP:NOTHERE. Peridon (talk) 14:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, salting seems a good idea. &para; Incidentally, the author of the article seems unfamiliar with reality. -- Hoary (talk) 14:09, 17 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment. Already past my bedtime, so others can attend to the fate of the the photo that currently appears in the article, the bizarrely (non-) licensed File:Blogger Dipjyoti Borah.jpg. -- Hoary (talk) 13:55, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.