Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dippoldism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Spartaz Humbug! 11:38, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Dippoldism

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Dictionary definition. Source contains only trivial mention of topic. Does not meet GNG. Stillwaterising (talk) 14:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  —Stillwaterising (talk) 14:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Google Books gives numerous hits for this word in context: clearly notable.  I have added a couple more references to the article.  Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 16:58, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: notable, multiply sourced, as per above. -- The Anome (talk) 17:02, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.