Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dipsita Dhar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — MarkH21talk 21:58, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Dipsita Dhar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not sure if being general secretary of Students Federation of India is good enough for being notable. Most of the notable references cover about Student Federation of India or Communist Party of India and not the concerned person exclusively. Also, WP:NPOL does suggest that a politician should win at least one reputed election and assume office to be considered as notable politician. Dixiku (talk) 19:37, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Dixiku (talk) 19:37, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:51, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:31, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

**Note: Ashique is the creator of the page. VV 06:27, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:NPOL also states, Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline. The WP:GNG guideline states, Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material, so a source does not need to be focused on her exclusively for it to support her notability. In addition, WP:BASIC states, If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability, and there are a lot of sources to review in this article that may support her notability when combined, especially if the coverage is WP:SUSTAINED over time. Beccaynr (talk) 01:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Two sources which give WP:SIGCOV are one and two. While there is a bit of cleaning up that is required of the article, it passes WP:BASIC even in the current form. VV 15:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep sources in article meet BASIC/GNG. Regards,--Goldsztajn (talk) 21:55, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per VV Furius (talk) 22:54, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added sources and have been revising the article, and at minimum, there is sustained WP:BASIC coverage over time supporting her notability. Beccaynr (talk) 23:07, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as WP:BASIC is fulfilled. the article has been cleaned up and WP:SUSTAINED coverage is clearly visible. VV 05:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep There are substantial media reports about the subject in both visual and print media. It includes English and multiple other Indian Languages (Bengali, Hindi, Malayalam). Also, the subject clearly passes WP:BASIC. (Ashique2020 (talk) 06:23, 9 April 2021 (UTC))
 * Keep This article is about an Indian women student leader. There are lot many independent media reports about her in national media, indicating her notability (Sanwar nath (talk) 07:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)).
 * Sanwar nath is the creator of the article (struck out erroneous message above). VV 07:55, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep:As per the improvements made by Beccaynr and the fact that she has recieved high amount of press coverage thus passing NPOL. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 09:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.