Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direct Access Democracy Canada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123   04:00, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Direct Access Democracy Canada
I can find no notability whatever for this outside of the site itself, and a few random blog and link entries, usually by John Oprea, the site's creator. No indication of any membership or coverage at all. David Oberst 02:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete David Oberst 02:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, per nom. Only 852 ghits, mostly leading to the results mentioned by Oberst. Admitted failure to even remotely qualify for registration with Elections Canada and not being able to field more than one candidate (even "unofficially") gives credence to this nomination. Agent 86 03:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn AdamBiswanger1 03:12, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Alphachimp  talk  06:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. --Coredesat 07:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete -- agree with Maxwell Smart above, good research -- MrDolomite 14:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- not even registered as an official party, no sign of any kind of grassroot support. Pascal.Tesson 22:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable enough. The party technically does not exist. Richardcavell 23:48, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd also suggest to the closing admin that we delete, rather than redirect, Direct Access Democracy and Direct Access Democracy Canada. - Richardcavell 23:50, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.