Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direct perception


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Direct realism. Owen&times; &#9742;  17:12, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Direct perception
Say what, Bub? This is contextless jibberjabber that needs to be erased before starting over. Eddie.willers 05:03, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 8Redirect per Dbtfz. --Terence Ong 13:16, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - This appears to be more of an attempt at a definition than an encyclopedic article. Its a rather bad attempt at a definition, as well. - Nortonew 05:06, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Direct realism -- the concept which this stub seems, in its pathetic way, to be trying to articulate. Dbtfz 05:29, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Dbtfz. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-23 07:43Z 
 * Redirect per Dbtfz. Deep, man.  Deep. KrazyCaley 09:10, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete  and I quote from the entry "My pants are on fire."  Seems to be nonsense added to a definition.  The initial comment can be moved per Dbtfz, it would need some expansion though.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.