Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direct physics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 17:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Direct physics

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD and PROD2. Non-notable technology, complete speculation based on an ad for employment. Corvus cornix 22:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as not verifiable. The first line explicitly reads "The contents of this articles are not verified. This is all speculation." Martijn Hoekstra 23:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, unverified, speculative. Doczilla 02:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as prodder. Would potentially be notable if it existed (even trivial Microsoft applications have a big effect given MS's clout) but this is pure crystal-ball gazing until Microsoft announce it. —  iride  scent  19:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.