Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Directorate of Matriculation Schools, Tamil Nadu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP as nomination withdrawn. (Non-admin closure) §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 05:59, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Directorate of Matriculation Schools, Tamil Nadu

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Equitable syllabus is enforced in Tamil Nadu. BabuOnWiki (talk) 12:09, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Please clarify. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:14, 20 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep I'll clarify what the nominator is suggesting and then provide my rationale: Tamil Nadu is now on this back and forth over Samacheer Kalvi, the goal of which is to integrate all state run certification boards under one umbrella. I believe, currently Samacheer Kalvi is in implementation (but given the back and forth on education policy based on which party is in power, this is bound to change). However, irrespective of the current story, the fact that this was one of three state-run certification systems until last year, and that it's significantly covered in reliable sources (very few of which are actually included in the article, which is a stub) makes this more than notable enough to be covered here. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  12:20, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:19, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:19, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:19, 20 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Even if Samacheer kalvi is implemented, the article could serve for recording history that such a directorate existed. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 16:31, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok then, We'll have the article. I'll try to expand the article by citing external references and present day's system. Let's close the discussion. --BabuOnWiki (talk) 04:27, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.