Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirk B. Paloutzian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies. Liz Read! Talk! 00:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Dirk B. Paloutzian

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not meet WP:GNG as an unsuccessful nominee for a federal judgeship. Let&#39;srun (talk) 00:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California. Let&#39;srun (talk) 00:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:BLP1E, no other secondary/independent/reliable/sigcov sources. &mdash;siro&chi;o 01:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP1E. I don't see any coverage other than the nomination accouncement.  APK  whisper in my ear  06:09, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Okoslavia (talk) 06:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Fails WP:BLP1E; no coverage in reliable sources beyond WP:ROUTINE. WJ94 (talk) 12:26, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Alternative proposal: Merge all otherwise non-notable failed presidential judicial nominees into a single article along the lines of Unsuccessful Donald Trump judicial nominations. We can preserve a truncated form of the data in one place, without reaching individual notability concerns. BD2412  T 21:09, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Presuming there is SIGCOV of that topic I'm fine with that (i.e. as long as it meets something like WP:NLIST. Closing admin might consider draftifying/userfying such articles to that end. There is a similar article at Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies but I think it serves a different purpose, but it may fit. &mdash;siro&chi;o 21:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I think a redirect to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies makes more sense, seeing as there is already a description of the WP:BLP1E for this nominee and the other non-notable failed presidential judicial nominees, along with details about specific dates regarding the nomination process. As it is, the list of otherwise non-notable judicial nominees for Trump is fairly small and I don't think there is the needed SIGCOV. Let&#39;srun (talk) 15:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with a redirect as well. &mdash;siro&chi;o 19:12, 18 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.