Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirk Bezemer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  14:40, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Dirk Bezemer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested BLP prod, no evidence of notability.  Acroterion   (talk)   16:47, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSA  talk   16:56, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  Owlf   17:08, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Very weak keep. He has a plausible case for WP:PROF via well cited publications in Google Scholar but we need more than a link to his personal web page to support even a stub like this. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 14:34, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep a case of WP:NEXIST Lightburst (talk) 20:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, clearly relevant according to WP:PROF with 4 publications with > 100 citations. But I agree, the article needs some work. --hroest 20:52, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep the article, it's notable and some sources as A, B, C, D, F, you can find that paid to subject.Forest90 (talk) 11:24, 10 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.