Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirtgirlworld


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. Clear 6-1 vote. Argument about poor sources has been addressed. Non-admin closure. -- Sailing to Byzantium  ( msg ),  01:22, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Dirtgirlworld

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Poorly sourced, certainly not encylopedia-worthy. – VegetaSaiyan...going Super Saiyan 5! (talk) 20:23, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep and Cleanup - I agree that the article has poor sources, but its notability comes from its 2-year run on ABC. Significant coverage can be found from this run and IMDb has some info at http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1638062/ Keep the article, but add up on sources. --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 21:29, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Here is a citation at abc.net.au: http://www.abc.net.au/children/dirtgirlworld/ ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 21:31, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * And a year on the BBC - David Gerard (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Program has aired on two major national networks and PBS's children's cable channel; sources are needed but at the very least being carried on those networks seals notability.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:41, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - prominent and popular internationally. This nomination demonstrates low attention to detail, and I would hope future nominations would show better attention to detail before your next run at admin - David Gerard (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:06, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep the Google News link on the top of the page demonstrates plenty of RS coverage about the show, which aired on multiple national networks. A cursory effort at WP:BEFORE would have prevented this. Jclemens (talk) 03:24, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Below is a small selection of the available sources.
 * The titles of the first two say all that needs to be said. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:32, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Problems with an article can be fixed through editing and are not a reason for deletion. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 23:39, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The titles of the first two say all that needs to be said. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:32, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Problems with an article can be fixed through editing and are not a reason for deletion. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 23:39, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * Keep Problems with an article can be fixed through editing and are not a reason for deletion. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 23:39, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.