Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirty Window


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete all. &mdash; Nearly Headless Nick   {C}  16:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Dirty Window

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not indiscriminate collection of information, or original research. None of these songs have any real significance, and there is no backing proof to claims as to what each song means. jpmck 15:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:
 * jpmck 15:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * jpmck 15:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * jpmck 15:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * jpmck 15:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * jpmck 15:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete All Definite OR. Wikipedia is not the place for analysis. -- Cy ru s      An dir on   15:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * delete but archive somewhere as quintessential OR, so this never, ever happens again. the_undertow talk  00:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all as content is totally unsubstantiate original research. WjBscribe 02:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.