Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirty electricity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:02, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Dirty electricity

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

"Dirty electricity may be the result of secretly installed power line bugs to spy business, government offices, or a somebody's home"??? A POV fork of Electromagnetic radiation and health and a product of the sock farm currently spreading electromagnetic radiation paranoia and pushing metering products. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC) LuckyLouie (talk) 19:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as it is now. Before March 2014 this was s disambiguation page giving three differnt conepts that were allsometimes called "dirty electricity".  Not too many Google Books hits on this phrase so it may well be undue weight to disambiguate. Context will be more useful to the reader in deciding if she wants to know more about human health or about keeping the buzz out of the stereo or smog out of the sky; the phrase has several referents.  --Wtshymanski (talk) 19:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Now that you've removed the fringe stuff and restored the article to a disambig page I don't see "dirty electricity" mentioned at any of the disambig articles, so I still recommend a delete. - LuckyLouie (talk) 22:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable sources, with the current sources being either self-published or apparent spam. No neutral discussion of the topic, and nothing useful to merge with environmental impact of electricity generation that I can see. Anaxial (talk) 19:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete; Wtshymanski puts it better than I ever could. bobrayner (talk) 10:47, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as complete bollocks. Guy (Help!) 15:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Insufficient reliable sourcing provided, or likely ever to be found.  Topic already covered at Electromagnetic radiation and health (but not worth a redirect there from this title). TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as not being appropriate under WP:DAB. A redirect to Environmental impact of electricity generation would work too, probably. ansh 666 05:41, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.