Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DisCleaner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 04:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

DisCleaner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability or external sourcing ViperSnake151   Talk  23:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can't find any reviews in reliable sources.  The usual locations – PC Magazine, PC World, CNET, etc – are all silent. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Promotional article about non-notable software created by the author of said software. MER-C 07:23, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. As above, article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 08:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.