Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Gaynor Lord


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of solved missing person cases: post-2000. czar 22:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Disappearance of Gaynor Lord

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Per WP:SENSATIONAL. A case of missing white woman syndrome. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United Kingdom. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and England.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  22:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep. The sources used here are The Guardian, BBC News, ITV News, and The Independent - not a single one which is a tabloid. WP:SENSATIONAL does not apply. 9News, the last source used, could be a tabloid, but even if it was, broad coverage by non-tabloids has been demonstrated. Furthermore, missing white woman syndrome isn't a valid reason to dismiss an article because 1) the term is used to highlight that non-white women deserve more coverage, not that white women deserve less, and 2) it's not Wikipedia's job trying to fix social issues. Cortador (talk) 23:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree with everything @Cortador said. There is, to my knowledge, no such as thing as WP: Missing White Women Syndrome even if this concept denotes a very real thing. Wickster12345 (talk) 08:15, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per my comment above. Wickster12345 (talk) 08:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTNEWS, WP:N, and WP:NEVENTS. All sources are primary sources that amount to routine news coverage. Notability requires secondary sources. Thebiguglyalien  ( talk ) 23:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of solved missing person cases: post-2000 per the same argument. I was not aware that the target page existed, but this is the optimal solution for these one-off incidents with no historical significance. Thebiguglyalien  ( talk ) 00:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. To add to my rationale, this article fails WP:NOTNEWS. It is a run-of-the-mill missing person case that lacks persistence beyond the news cycle and will not have a lasting effect, beyond her friends and family. I also agree with Thebiguglyalien. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of solved missing person cases: post-2000 where it can be sufficiently covered. It was, after all, a high-profile case while the search for her was ongoing. This is Paul (talk) 00:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I support this option; I had no idea that list existed. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:12, 20 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Merge as per above Mr Vili   talk  00:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Merge to List of solved missing person cases: post-2000, as proposed by User:This is Paul. Schrödinger's jellyfish &#9993; 03:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.