Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Jessica Seybold


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Disappearance of Jessica Seybold

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable disappearance. The woman had done nothing prior to vanishing that made her notable. Even the act of vanishing does not seem to be notable in any way. Article violates What Wikipedia is not and Notability (events). CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:07, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Crime,  and Washington. Skynxnex (talk) 20:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - This disappearance is not notable enough for inclusion. Nothing unique, no major coverage by media. As of today, delete.BabbaQ (talk) 20:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * There is some media coverage. Did you search for any? DiamondRemley39 (talk) 14:11, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete more than half a million people are reported missing in the United States every year. There is nothing about this case that makes it notable. Mccapra (talk) 21:15, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Interesting choice of a stat to bring up in the AfD... I searched that. I found "According to NamUs (National Missing and Unidentified Persons System), more than 600,000 persons go missing in the United States every year. Anywhere between 89 percent to 92 percent of those missing people are recovered every year, either alive or deceased".1 So she'd be in the ~60,000 not found. It's not about her having been reported missing in the first place, but remaining missing so long after that was reported, and what's happened after. I haven't researched much or reviewed sources yet and so I won't vote, but... half a million people going missing doesn't mean 0 of them are notable. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 14:18, 4 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 22:50, 1 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete No indication that this case is any different than the myriad missing person cases that, unfortunately, occur regularly. WP:BIO1E and WP:VICTIM apply here as the subject is notable solely for her disappearance and the circumstances of such are not particularly notable.-- Ponyo bons mots 17:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ponyo non notable disappearance.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't appear to meet any of the inclusion criteria under Notability (events). May pass GNG on certain interpretations, but I agree with the view expressed in this AfD that it seems to be a non-notable disappearance due to apparent lack of wide, indepth, significant coverage. Rupples (talk) 18:49, 7 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.