Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disbelievers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 09:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Disbelievers

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is kind of a dictionary definition. Also, it would be covered in the other articles on specific religions. Also, does it need to be said that to people who believe in something (anything) that people that do no believe as they do are disbelievers? Looks like a POV nightmare waiting to happen. Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 19:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

No they have to call them "people who believe in something else". If I say I am not a christian or a jew of a muslim how can they then know that there is nothing else where I believe in. If the bible of quoran speaks about "disbelievers" then they have not the right to call me a "disbeliever" ! They have to keep me out of their ridiculous and dangerous doctrines. If I should me calling "disbeliever" why then not "person who will burns after his death in hell for eternity" !

If they have, if not calling me a disbeliever, to throw there religion onto the scrapheap is their problem. Not mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Limboot (talk • contribs) 14:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I believe this comment pretty much proves my point.-- Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 19:51, 19 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:WINAD. This article is no more than a dicdef, not to mention unsourced and poorly written. Nor is it even the normal word used in this context; "unbeliever" is the more frequent usage. Wal  ton  Vivat Regina!  19:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Although this could be a good entry for wikipedia but at present its more similar to dictionary entry instead of encyclopedia one.-- Sa.vakilian(t-c) 11:13, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Sa.vakilian. --pIrish 18:00, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * delete too vague and too short, though a good article could later be written on this topic.--Sefringle 04:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.