Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disco!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. Clearly, consensus will not develop to delete this. (non-admin closure) — VersaceSpace  🌃 04:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Disco!

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Recording by US rapper Mike, fails WP:NALBUM, WP:GNG - tried redirecting to Mike article but reverted, so here we are. No chart placement, passing mentions in listicles, "multiple, non-trivial, published works" is not passed, neither is gold disc, notable award etc Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and United States of America. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep There are multiple third-party reliable sources that review the album in detail (HipHopDX, Pitchfork, Spin, Stereogum). The album has been included in multiple "Best Albums of 2021" year-end lists (NPR, Okayplayer, Paste, Pitchfork, PopMatters). The album appeared on the Billboard Top Current Album Sales chart. I believe the album meets the first criterion of WP:NALBUM ("The recording has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it") and the second criterion of WP:NALBUM ("The recording has appeared on any country's national music chart"). 2400:4050:C222:B700:79E3:73B6:BE11:2482 (talk) 15:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. 2400:4050:C222:B700:79E3:73B6:BE11:2482 (talk) 15:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - per sourcing above. I was suspecting a failure of WP:BEFORE, but a bunch of those sources were even in the article at the time of creation, so I'm really not understand where the nominator's head is at on this one. Easy clearance of the WP:GNG. Sergecross73   msg me  16:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes both WP:NALBUM and the WP:GNG. Unsure why this was redirected, then nominated. There is no case for an AfD, let alone for one-sided redirecting. gidonb (talk) 19:16, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Known artist, and Billboard non-appearances are not an article disqualification.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 22:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep per 2400's sources providing an easy SIGCOV pass. Pretty amazed an AfD like this would even get made when all that coverage was already there. QuietHere (talk) 13:34, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - A pretty obvious failure of WP:BEFORE. Reliable sources for the album can be found very easily, including in the article itself before the AFD was initiated. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 14:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per gidonb  TITAN O SAURUS  05:10, 11 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.