Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disco-Funk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. done by User:Jayjg. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:50, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Disco-Funk

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

A DAB page with two original research entries. The first a made up genre that links to two articles. The second a real genre article but no where in the article is this term used. Ridernyc (talk) 13:28, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Seems to serve no purpose except to imply the existence of a fusion genre for which there is no evidence and mention.-- SabreBD  (talk)  15:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete as neither entry meets the guidelines, this could be a case for Template:db-disambig. Boleyn2 (talk) 15:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I've seen "disco-funk" used occasionally by critics who can't stop micro-categorizing innovative music, but that's their problem not ours. The term has not been used in any reliable of verifiable fashion. D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 16:45, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * This doesn't make any sense at all. Nominate a disambiguation page as AfD is just funny. Why the page wasn't merged with Disco? ItsAlwaysLupus (talk) 22:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.