Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DiscountMugs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 19:06, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

DiscountMugs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP as the only coverage in reliable sources is mentions in relation to a merger of the parent company. No other sources found. (PROD disputed by BiH who was paid to write it). SmartSE (talk) 19:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:NCORP. I was able to find press releases (which is not a reliable source per WP:NCORP), but not much else. As mentioned by SmartSE, there were a brief mention or two of some merger, but the NCORP guideline also states that simple merger announcements do not show notability. -- Biblio worm  15:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - The Inc. ranking (4423) is not that significant as with the Ernst & Young award; my searches only found PR here and here. I would be open to drafting to author BiH's userpage for future use. SwisterTwister   talk  17:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - typical quality of paid editing for commercial entity. If it ever gains notability, restart from scratch per WP:TNT. — Brianhe (talk) 21:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.