Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discovery Profiling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd (?!? - help us) 00:48, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Discovery Profiling
Not nonsense, but no context to explain what it is or what its for. Even following the link provides no help MNewnham 01:20, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination Liamdaly620 01:22, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No references in the article to back up the claim of being the best of whatever it is. Ruby 03:07, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like some kind of spam. After 30 seconds I gave up trying to figure it out. Peyna 03:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * It's an online workplace psychological evaluation test that produces a personal profile. I've actually taken part of the test so far. Still, definitely not notable, so delete. Grandmasterka 09:53, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom and Grandmasterka. Interesting, but definetely not notable enough to warrant its inclusion. -  Phædriel   ♥ tell me - 16:57, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Latinus 18:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unintelligible. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-24 05:33Z 


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.