Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discrimination against conservatives in the context of an opposition of same sex marriage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 22:08, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Discrimination against conservatives in the context of an opposition of same sex marriage

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing listed; no examples given. I doubt any conservatives have faced actual "discrimination" in the literal definition of the word as other "discrimination" articles on Wikipedia describe (see discrimination against atheists and discrimination against the homeless, for instance, that deal with legal discrimination against the respective groups). The examples listed at discrimination against conservatives are not discrimination. Seattle (talk) 00:15, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment please read all before responding. The article relates to a page entitled Discrimination against conservatives which was sensibly placed in review in AfD at 12:41, 21 June 2014 (UTC). Gregkaye (talk) 00:18, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I'd suggest listing perceived instances of discrimination against conservatives in the context of an opposition of same sex marriage on the Discrimination against conservatives in the context of an opposition of same sex marriage page for evaluation at this AFD. Seattle (talk) 00:32, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per A3 No Content. The article consists of nothing but a rephrasing of the title, which is grounds for deletion under A3. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:35, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Not sure why this wasn't speedied in the first place. Agree this falls under A3, no content. —&#160;&#160;  &#160;&#160;Bill W.&#160;&#160;  &#160;&#160; (Talk)&#160;&#160;(Contrib)&#160;&#160; (User:Wtwilson3) &#160;&#160;— 02:57, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 22 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete An unreferenced single sentence article that fails to mention even a single example of such discrimination. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:21, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy per above arguments; but even if it was populated from the other article, I'd say delete. I'm not clear why you created this page; it comes across as setting up a backup in case the AfD fails, without addressing the concerns of the AfD. --Nat Gertler (talk) 03:27, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Apparently a pointy creation resulting from discussion at Articles for deletion/Discrimination against conservatives. Tarc (talk) 05:12, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete for all the reasons listed above, plus the minor additions of my own: (i) the title would be unwieldy even if it were in idiomatic English; (ii) the title isn't in idiomatic English (or at least not in my lect, wherein we have opposition to this or that). -- Hoary (talk) 05:18, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Per CSD A3: no content. Philg88 ♦talk 08:37, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - CSD A3 - No Content - I'm actually lost as to why the nom (or someone) didn't CSD this in the first place really. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:11, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD. This is not a notable topic and it begs the question. Essentially, it duplicates the subject of another bad article, Discrimination against conservatives, making it also eligible for WP:CSD.- MrX 14:25, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW and WP:GRIEF. Bearian (talk) 20:39, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:01, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - POV essay. Not an encyclopedic topic. Carrite (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.